![]() It limits you on features which saves them $ by making development easier. Unfortunately those issue trickle down to PC players as well.īy design the consoles biggest flaw is designed as a cash grab. I just don't like how console and the gamers on that platform are being treated by publishers and some devs. Unfortunately I pray for the day the console dies. But get to know your develeopers before you assume a WAW remaster will be bad.Īt least on a console hackers arent so bad. Originally posted by meh:I agree with you guys. However I did grow to like Infinity Warfare for its space simulation and a few multiplayer game play features, it still doesn't bring them back to their MW2 graces. They did give us COD 4 MW and COD MW 2 but since then it's been a turd show of disappointing titles. Followed by Infinity ward as second suckiest. Also the very very very very very very poor WW2 rating on steam is also scientific proof that their latest game is just as bad as a turd on a white carpet.ĭevelopers that suck: Sledgehammer Games, keep that in mind. So I suppose the large volume of MW3 trade-ins soon after release can be your scientific proof. I remember selling my MW3 not long after release and got only $3 for it at gamestop because everyone was trading that turd in. It's my opinion, and they screwed up MW3 and WW2. NEVER.Īnd yes that is anecdotal un-scientific proof. ![]() Sledgehammer games never made a good COD. WAW was made by Treyarch, they make good stuff. But get to know your develeopers before you assume a WAW remaster will be bad.Ī remastered WAW can still be better than WW2 if done by Treyarch again. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |